Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] fuse: fix missing barriers in io-uring init
Joanne Koong <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:51:20 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.fuse-devel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJnrk1Zo_j_QY9Q=jft5=fio9mU36uy5LXP3bC4=xO8DbakzrA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 3:11 PM Joanne Koong <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 10:54 AM Joanne Koong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > These are two pre-existing issues Sashiko reported [1] on the fuse zerocopy > > series. > > > > [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630211436.2062816-1-joannelkoong%40gmail.com > > Sashiko noted some other places that are also missing barriers [1]. > Will send v2 to add these places as well. These additional ones aren't real bugs. They're not reachable on a well-behaved server and on a malicious/buggy server, the failure is benign / self-correcting. I think we need some sort of way to help Sashiko understand so it doesn't keep flagging this on every future patch anyone submits. I think there's a few other places where some of Sashiko's assumptions/analysis are wrong (eg uring-cmd sqe stability semantics [1] in the zero-copy series). I'll look into this unless anyone already knows how to do this. Thanks, Joanne [1] https://lore.kernel.org/fuse-devel/CAJnrk1Y2tiwCecH-HVyaP79kcmBoEYu--mmwRKzp=9uZNaiSUA@mail.gmail.com/ > > [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713175345.2542331-1-joannelkoong%40gmail.com