Re: [PATCH V12 02/12] famfs: Module operations, fs_context, and mount
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.fuse-devel,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,org.kernel.vger.linux-cxl,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260811-baugebiet-hofiert-fanden-3354f4a5e820@brauner> |
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 10:59:50AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 at 06:37, Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > IOWs, let's fix the remaining wobbles (if any) and just merge this > > already. No more side quests through gigantic refactorings of fusex, > > that's too much to ask after you already redesigned and reimplemented > > the whole thing already. > > Without any intention to change the direction, let me just state some facts: > > - it was never suggested that famfs depend on the fusex work in any way > > - the plan to add famfs mappings to fuse was laid out two and a half > years ago in reply to the very first rfc posting and has basically > remained unchanged since then: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJfpegv8XzFvty_x00UehUQxw9ai8BytvGNXE8SL03zfsTN6ag@mail.gmail.com/ > > I understand how that seemingly simple API addition was overwhelming > for John, and I should have been more proactive in helping with the > implementation. That's entirely my fault. > > On the other hand John could have been more trusting that the plan will work. > > But that's behind us now, let's move on... with fuse, please...