Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] fuse: caches documentation and testing

Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.fuse-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest
Message-ID <CAOQ4uxhoOKC7XyK7D_izd-=28RC2OA0Xmjf41rhhO2kPhM7F1Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 4:11 PM Luis Henriques <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm (finally!) sending v2 of this patchset.  It tries to document (and add
> a few kselftests) to the different types of caches that are currently in use
> within FUSE.  As I mentioned in v1 the idea for documenting this came from
> Miklos during this year's LSFMM, where he mentioned he would like to see
> caches usage documented before he could merge an initial version of fusex.
>
> This version documents symlinks, attributes, ACLs and readdir caches.  Still
> missing: dentries and data caching.
>
> I'm still sending it as an RFC as I'm still not sure if it fulfils Miklos'
> initial goal.
>
> As usual feedback is welcome, as I'll (slowly) continue looking into other
> cache types.
>
> Major changes since v1:
> - Added more caches to the document
> - Changed tests format to single self-contained binaries
> - Since Amir added a new fuse3-based test, the conversion to fuse3 of the
>   fusectl has minor changes to the Makefile
>   - NOTE: I've kept Amir's Reviewed-by anyway (should I drop it?)

It's fine. I trust your judgement.

Please see Sashiko review comments.

My main concern is with the doc - it's not an easy read
and I would have liked it to be and I found many correctness error
which is not a good sign.

Thanks,
Amir.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.