Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] fuse: caches documentation and testing
Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.fuse-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOQ4uxhoOKC7XyK7D_izd-=28RC2OA0Xmjf41rhhO2kPhM7F1Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 4:11 PM Luis Henriques <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm (finally!) sending v2 of this patchset. It tries to document (and add > a few kselftests) to the different types of caches that are currently in use > within FUSE. As I mentioned in v1 the idea for documenting this came from > Miklos during this year's LSFMM, where he mentioned he would like to see > caches usage documented before he could merge an initial version of fusex. > > This version documents symlinks, attributes, ACLs and readdir caches. Still > missing: dentries and data caching. > > I'm still sending it as an RFC as I'm still not sure if it fulfils Miklos' > initial goal. > > As usual feedback is welcome, as I'll (slowly) continue looking into other > cache types. > > Major changes since v1: > - Added more caches to the document > - Changed tests format to single self-contained binaries > - Since Amir added a new fuse3-based test, the conversion to fuse3 of the > fusectl has minor changes to the Makefile > - NOTE: I've kept Amir's Reviewed-by anyway (should I drop it?) It's fine. I trust your judgement. Please see Sashiko review comments. My main concern is with the doc - it's not an easy read and I would have liked it to be and I found many correctness error which is not a good sign. Thanks, Amir.