Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: Fix the condition to enable over-io-uring
Baokun Li <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.fuse-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bernd,
On 2026/8/22 00:19, Bernd Schubert via B4 Relay wrote:
> + /* Once a connection has io-uring enabled on it, it can't be disabled */
> + if (!enable_uring && !fch->io_uring) {
> + pr_info_ratelimited("fuse-io-uring is disabled by module parameter\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + if (!fch->io_uring) {
> + pr_info_ratelimited(
> + "fuse-io-uring not enabled on this connection\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
This combined with the REGISTER error path can hang IO when the ring is
already operational. E.g. 100 entries, the 100th REGISTER fails after
ring->ready is set:
new request: server fetch:
fuse_send_one() IORING_OP_URING_CMD
fiq->ops->send_req() fuse_uring_cmd()
fuse_uring_queue_fuse_req() if (!fch->io_uring) // == 0
-> queued, no consumer return -EOPNOTSUPP
The error path clears fch->io_uring but never reverts fiq->ops, so
requests keep flowing into io_uring queues while COMMIT_AND_FETCH is
rejected for all 99 active entries.
Maybe only tear down if the ring never became ready:
if (err) {
if (!fuse_uring_ready(fch)) {
fch->io_uring = 0;
wake_up_all(&fch->blocked_waitq);
pr_info("[%u] fuse-io-uring disabled on connection err=%d\n",
fch->conn->dev, err);
}
return err;
}
Regards,
Baokun