[PATCH 05/16] btrfs: fix the comment on btrfs_update_time

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.gfs2,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Since commit e41f941a2311 ("Btrfs: move over to use ->update_time") this
is not a copy of the high-level file_update_time helper.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 6282911e536f..05f6d272c5d7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6291,8 +6291,8 @@ static int btrfs_dirty_inode(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
 }
 
 /*
- * This is a copy of file_update_time.  We need this so we can return error on
- * ENOSPC for updating the inode in the case of file write and mmap writes.
+ * We need our own ->update_time so that we can return error on ENOSPC for
+ * updating the inode in the case of file write and mmap writes.
  */
 static int btrfs_update_time(struct inode *inode, int flags)
 {
-- 
2.47.3
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.