Re: [PATCH 1/9] block: fix data loss and stale date exposure problems during append write

Stephen Zhang <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Nov 2025 15:08:38 +0800

Newsgroups	dev.linux.lists.gfs2,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID	<CANubcdVx3MkWwncj1S0cS4FN+Stt8FpHD89dCFeStsd2QE=2sg@mail.gmail.com>

Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> 于2025年11月21日周五 17:35写道：
>
> On 11/21/25 9:19 AM, zhangshida wrote:
> > From: Shida Zhang <[email protected]>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <[email protected]>
>
>
> Regardless of the code change, this needs documentation what you are
> doing and why it is correct
>

Okay, will do that if I can get the chance to make a v2 version.

Thanks,
Shida

> > ---
> >   block/bio.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> > index b3a79285c27..55c2c1a0020 100644
> > --- a/block/bio.c
> > +++ b/block/bio.c
> > @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static struct bio *__bio_chain_endio(struct bio *bio)
> >
> >   static void bio_chain_endio(struct bio *bio)
> >   {
> > -     bio_endio(__bio_chain_endio(bio));
> > +     bio_endio(bio);
> >   }
> >
> >   /**
>
>