Re: Fix potential data loss and corruption due to Incorrect BIO Chain Handling
Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.gfs2,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Christoph, On 2025/11/27 15:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 03:05:29PM +0800, Stephen Zhang wrote: >> No, they are not using bcache. > > Then please figure out how bio_chain_endio even gets called in this > setup. I think for mainline the approach should be to fix bcache > and eorfs to not call into ->bi_end_io and add a BUG_ON() to Just saw this. For erofs, let me fix this directly to use bio_endio() instead and go through the erofs (although it doesn't matter in practice since no chain i/os for erofs and bio interfaces are unique and friendly to operate bvecs for both block or non-block I/Os compared to awkward bvec interfaces) and I will Cc you, Ming and Stephen then. Thanks, Gao Xiang