Re: Fix potential data loss and corruption due to Incorrect BIO Chain Handling

Stephen Zhang <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:32:58 +0800

Newsgroups	dev.linux.lists.gfs2,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID	<CANubcdWh0zZpOqhBhWtKf0uN1+8Ec-RsHiSCQUFrqYXoux2-TA@mail.gmail.com>

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> 于2025年11月27日周四 22:46写道：
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 03:40:20PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > For erofs, let me fix this directly to use bio_endio() instead
> > and go through the erofs (although it doesn't matter in practice
> > since no chain i/os for erofs and bio interfaces are unique and
> > friendly to operate bvecs for both block or non-block I/Os
> > compared to awkward bvec interfaces) and I will Cc you, Ming
> > and Stephen then.
>
> Thanks.  I'll ping Coly for bcache.
>

I would like the opportunity to fix this issue in bcache. From my analysis, it
seems the solution may be as straightforward as replacing the ->bi_end_io
assignment with a call to bio_endio().

Thanks,
shida