Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] block: prevent race condition on bi_status in __bio_chain_endio

Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.gfs2,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID <CAHc6FU43FWMYm2y2b9EvrFzsJdOn55s2QOMxCfRiHKVMVRqQaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 9:32 AM zhangshida <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Shida Zhang <[email protected]>
>
> Andreas point out that multiple completions can race setting
> bi_status.
>
> The check (parent->bi_status) and the subsequent write are not an
> atomic operation. The value of parent->bi_status could have changed
> between the time you read it for the if check and the time you write
> to it. So we use cmpxchg to fix the race, as suggested by Christoph.
>
> Suggested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  block/bio.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 55c2c1a0020..aa43435c15f 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -313,9 +313,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_reset);
>  static struct bio *__bio_chain_endio(struct bio *bio)
>  {
>         struct bio *parent = bio->bi_private;
> +       blk_status_t *status = &parent->bi_status;
> +       blk_status_t new_status = bio->bi_status;
> +
> +       if (new_status != BLK_STS_OK)
> +               cmpxchg(status, BLK_STS_OK, new_status);

This isn't wrong, but bi_status is explicitly set to 0 and compared
with 0 all over the place, so putting in BLK_STS_OK here doesn't
really help IMHO.

>
> -       if (bio->bi_status && !parent->bi_status)
> -               parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status;
>         bio_put(bio);
>         return parent;
>  }
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Thanks,
Andreas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.