Re: [v2] gfs2: Fix use-after-free in gfs2_fill_super()
Ryota Sakamoto <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.gfs2,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHMDPKUZgJ80k+u_e45FGSPz5N4sjBfX0AtWu3Oqr79wMSx3MA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 4:46 PM Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a need to indicate a role for the mentioned identifier? Yes, "fail_threads" is a goto label. And including "label" in the message explicitly is precise. > Do you propose to use another label here? Yes, I am proposing a new label "fail_threads". I chose this name to maintain consistency with the existing error labels in this function (e.g., fail_per_node, fail_inodes). If a v3 is required for other reasons, I will update the commit message to include "label". Regards,