Re: [PATCH 00/24] vfs: require filesystems to explicitly opt-in to lease support
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.gfs2,dev.linux.lists.ntfs3,dev.linux.lists.ocfs2-devel,dev.linux.lists.v9fs,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-nilfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 12:12:55PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > I mainly focused on filesystems that are NFS exportable, since NFS and > SMB are the main users of file leases, and they tend to end up exporting > the same filesystem types. Let me know if I've missed any. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected]/ That seems reasonable, and I like the approach here (without having the time to review every change right now): Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> If it turns out we have people use leases on other file systems we'll have to wire up a few more instance as needed, but I think your initial set makes sense.