Re: re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files v4
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.gfs2,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260112-canceln-skript-95f066b9fcc1@brauner> |
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:05:58AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:04:17AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 08:32:47AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 10:43:49PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > > Umm, as in my self reply just before heading out for vacation, Julia > > > > > found issues in it using static type checking tools. I have a new > > > > > version that fixes that and sorts out the S_* mess. So please drop > > > > > it again for now, I'll resend the fixed version ASAP. > > > > > > > > It has never been pushed nor applied as I saw your mail right before all > > > > of that. > > > > > > Thanks. But maybe you can fix up the applied messages to be more > > > specific? We had various issues in the past with them, where they > > > were sent, but things did not end up in the tree for various reasons. > > > > What are you thinking of exactly? > > Only send out the applied message when something is actually pushed > to the public tree? When that happens it usually means that it's still waiting on tests. I can pay more attention to this but don't expect it to be perfect in all cases.