Re: [PATCH 01/10 net-next v3] ipv6: convert CONFIG_IPV6 to built-in only and clean up Kconfigs

Fernando Fernandez Mancera <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:14:51 +0100
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.gfs2,dev.linux.lists.bridge,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/18/26 7:51 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/03/2026 15:00, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>> Maintaining a modular IPv6 stack offers image size savings for specific
>> setups, this benefit is outweighed by the architectural burden it
>> imposes on the subsystems on implementation and maintenance. Therefore,
>> drop it.
>>
>> Change CONFIG_IPV6 from tristate to bool. Remove all Kconfig
>> dependencies across the tree that explicitly checked for IPV6=m. In
>> addition, remove MODULE_DESCRIPTION(), MODULE_ALIAS(), MODULE_AUTHOR()
>> and MODULE_LICENSE().
>>
>> This is also replacing module_init() by device_initcall(). It is not
>> possible to use fs_initcall() as IPv4 does because that creates a race
>> condition on IPv6 addrconf.
>>
>> Finally, modify the default configs from CONFIG_IPV6=m to CONFIG_IPV6=y
>> except for m68k as according to the bloat-o-meter the image is
>> increasing by 330KB~ and that isn't acceptable. Instead, disable IPv6 on
>> this architecture by default. This is aligned with m68k RAM requirements
>> and recommendations [1].
>>
>> [1] http://www.linux-m68k.org/faq/ram.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <[email protected]>
>> Tested-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <[email protected]>
> 
> That's a Kconfig/defconfig only patch, so build system. You cannot test
> it in a meaning of testing code. Building code is not testing.
> 

I do not agree. This isn't a Kconfig/defconfig only patch. It is taking 
down some module logic like changing module_init() to device_initcall(). 
Indeed, on v1, this patch was introducing a regression as it was using 
fs_initcall().

>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> 
> You removed important parts of Ack. It was not provided like that.
> 

Sorry about that. I will make sure to include the # arm64 on the next 
revision.

Thanks,
Fernando.