Re: [PATCH v2] gfs2: reject journal extents with gaps

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 5:22 AM Deepanshu Kartikey
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A malicious or corrupted GFS2 filesystem image can have a journal
> extent list with gaps between extents. gfs2_find_jhead() advances
> blocks_read sequentially through all page indices, but only grabs
> pages for blocks it actually visits via filemap_grab_folio(). Pages
> falling in the gaps between extents are never grabbed. When the
> cleanup loop at out: calls gfs2_jhead_process_page() for these
> pages, filemap_get_folio() returns ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) which is passed
> directly to folio_wait_locked() without checking for errors, hanging
> the kernel task in uninterruptible sleep (state D) forever,
> triggering the hung task watchdog.
>
> Fix this by rejecting journal extents with gaps at mapping time
> in gfs2_add_jextent(). If the new extent does not start exactly
> where the previous one ended, return -EINVAL to reject the
> corrupted journal early, before any I/O is submitted.
>
> Fixes: f4686c26ecc3 ("gfs2: read journal in large chunks")
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9013411dc43f3582823a
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/ [v1]
> Suggested-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Instead of checking ERR_PTR in gfs2_jhead_process_page(), reject
>   the gap at extent mapping time in gfs2_add_jextent() as suggested
>   by Andreas Gruenbacher.
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> index 1cd8ec0bce83..d3ba37291e4c 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> @@ -2219,6 +2219,8 @@ static int gfs2_add_jextent(struct gfs2_jdesc *jd, u64 lblock, u64 dblock, u64 b
>
>         if (!list_empty(&jd->extent_list)) {
>                 jext = list_last_entry(&jd->extent_list, struct gfs2_journal_extent, list);
> +               if (jext->lblock + jext->blocks != lblock)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
>                 if ((jext->dblock + jext->blocks) == dblock) {
>                         jext->blocks += blocks;
>                         return 0;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Gentle ping on this patch. Please let me know the status of this patch

Thanks