RE: Non systematic PCIe error on resume on i.MX8QP on Linux 7.2

Hongxing Zhu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.imx,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci
Message-ID <GV2PR04MB120197D555F17DCC9B0441EB88CCF2@GV2PR04MB12019.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2026 5:39 PM
> To: Hongxing Zhu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>; Frank Li <[email protected]>; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Non systematic PCIe error on resume on i.MX8QP on Linux 7.2
> 
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 09:16:27AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2026 1:28 PM
> > > To: Hongxing Zhu <[email protected]>; Frank Li
> > > <[email protected]>; linux- [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; linux- [email protected]
> > > Subject: Non systematic PCIe error on resume on i.MX8QP on Linux 7.2
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > our CI spotted this error on resume. It is not systematic, and it is
> > > possible that this is not a new issue from 7.2.
> > >
> > > Does it rings any bell?
> > >
> > > [  745.849237] imx8qm-hsio-phy 5f180000.phy: HSIO_PM_REQ_CORE_RST is
> > > set [  745.855800] phy phy-5f180000.phy.1: phy poweron failed -->
> > > -110
> > Based on the log, the PHY initialization is failing during resume.
> > I'll set up a platform on my end to see if I can reproduce this issue consistently.
> 
> Thanks for the support, appreciated.
> 
> > BTW, is this occurring on the i.MX8QM MEK board?
> The issue is on apalis-imx8 (you can find the DT in the usual place in the linux
> kernel tree).
> 
> > What's the frequency of occurrence in CI (failure rate)?
> The last batch was 3 failure in 10 executions, so 30%.
Hi Francesco:
I tried the stress PM tests on both i.MX8QM MEK and i.MX8QXP MEK boards.
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce this random problem.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> 
> Francesco
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.