Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure

Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.iommu,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 10:20:32AM +0000, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index c909c9a88538..9508bf50d14c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -1207,10 +1207,15 @@ void arm_smmu_attach_commit(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state);
>  int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  				struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
>  				struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
>  				bool sync);
> +bool arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd);
 
Is this needed?

Nicolin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.