Re: [PATCH 06/12] iommu: qcom_iommu: support non-TZ-managed instances

Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.iommu,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/9/26 10:15 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The GPU on MSM8974 has never been usable upstream because its IOMMU
> cannot be driven: unlike the MSM8916-style instances this driver
> supports, where the secure world owns the SMMU global register space
> and the OS programs just the context banks after a restore_sec_cfg SCM
> call, the MSM8974 GPU IOMMU is not managed by TZ at all. Nobody sets
> up its stream mapping, so attaching a domain leaves every transaction
> unmatched and the GPU faults on its first memory access. Verified on
> the APQ8074 dragonboard: restore_sec_cfg is only accepted for the
> secured instances, while the GPU instance exposes its ID registers to
> the OS (IDR0 0x78034404 / IDR1 0x10000003).
> 
> Add a non-secure programming mode, derived from the downstream
> msm_iommu-v1.c driver. When qcom,iommu-secure-id is absent, reset and
> program the global space at runtime resume instead of calling into TZ:
> clear sACR/sCR2 and the global fault state, invalidate the TLB and all
> SMRs, install the per-instance stream mapping (SMR/S2CR/CBAR, with the
> downstream MEMATTR/NSCFG/VMID/IRPTNDX values) and enable the SMMU with
> fault reporting enabled and stalling disabled (sCR0.STALLD, matching
> the downstream terminate model). The stream ID map is per-instance
> configuration data since it is not discoverable from the hardware; the
> SMR index allocation keeps ASID == context bank index, which this
> hardware requires (downstream msm-3.10 commit 4d92ea10aac3 ("iommu:
> msm: Use CB index as ASID")). Also set CB_ACTLR to redirect cacheable
> requests to the L2 slave port, as the downstream driver does for every
> context on this IP generation - on MSM8916 TZ owns CB_ACTLR, so the
> driver never needed to touch it before.

At this point, would it make more sense to retrofit this atop
arm-smmu-qcom.c given all of the differences vs 8916?

Konrad
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.