Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs()
Wei Liu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.iommu,org.kernel.vger.linux-hyperv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 01:51:16PM +0000, Naman Jain wrote: > fixup_irqs() re-injects a pending interrupt on its new target CPU by > looking at the outermost domain chip and invoking its irq_retrigger() > callback directly. That only works when the outermost chip happens to > install an irq_retrigger() callback, which is not guaranteed for every > irqchip and could lead to lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug. > > Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() instead, which walks up the interrupt > hierarchy until it finds a chip that implements irq_retrigger(). > > While at it, move the loop-local variables into the loop scope and use a > scoped guard for desc->lock. > > No functional change intended for chips which already provide an > irq_retrigger() callback on the outermost domain. > > Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Naman Jain <[email protected]> I can pick this up as part of this series but this requires an ack from Thomas. Wei > --- > arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 23 +++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c > index 30122f0b3af96..ef1bdd3c4659a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c > @@ -466,11 +466,6 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_posted_msi_notification) > /* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */ > void fixup_irqs(void) > { > - unsigned int vector; > - struct irq_desc *desc; > - struct irq_data *data; > - struct irq_chip *chip; > - > irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu(); > > /* > @@ -489,22 +484,18 @@ void fixup_irqs(void) > * vector_lock because the cpu is already marked !online, so > * nothing else will touch it. > */ > - for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) { > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]))) > + for (unsigned int vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) { > + struct irq_desc *desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]); > + > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc)) > continue; > > if (is_vector_pending(vector)) { > - desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]); > - > - raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock); > - data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc); > - chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data); > - if (chip->irq_retrigger) { > - chip->irq_retrigger(data); > + guard(raw_spinlock)(&desc->lock); > + if (irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(&desc->irq_data)) > __this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_RETRIGGERED); > - } > - raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock); > } > + > if (__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]) != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED) > __this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED); > } > -- > 2.43.0 > >