I
Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.iommu,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-21 13:38, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> > > pdev->p2pdma has two lifetime models. Provider-based entry points are > quiesced by their driver before remove completes. pci_p2pmem_find_many() > and the p2pmem sysfs attributes can race with unbind and therefore rely > on the teardown grace period. > > Document publication, teardown, and how the grace period protects both > the struct pci_p2pdma object and its optional gen_pool. > > Tested-by: Tushar Dave <[email protected]> > Cc: Alex Williamson <[email protected]> > Cc: Matt Evans <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c > index a77ef9deb3c6..49bc8cf06240 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c > @@ -21,6 +21,39 @@ > #include <linux/seq_buf.h> > #include <linux/xarray.h> > > +/* > + * Lifetime and RCU usage > + * > + * Within one driver bind, pdev->p2pdma is published exactly once, by Is published the right verb here? Seems like we use published for different purposes in p2pdma and calling pcim_p2pdma_init() publishing reads strangely. > + * pcim_p2pdma_init(), and cleared exactly once, by the pci_p2pdma_release() > + * devres action that the same function installs. It is never re-pointed at a "It is never re-pointed at" is some strange wording. I had to read it a few times to understand what it is saying. > + * second struct pci_p2pdma, so a reader that observes a non-NULL pointer > + * always observes the same, fully initialised object. That object is devres > + * memory allocated before the action is installed, so devres frees it only > + * after pci_p2pdma_release() has returned. I don't quite follow the point of this paragraph. It's like it's building to some kind of gotcha, but all it seems to be saying is is the life cycle of pdev->p2pdma is the same as the lifecycle of pdev. > + * Most exported entry points reach pdev->p2pdma through a struct pci_dev or a > + * struct p2pdma_provider owned by the provider driver, and > + * pcim_p2pdma_provider() requires callers to drop those references before the > + * driver's remove() completes. Those cannot run concurrently with > + * pci_p2pdma_release(), and their rcu_dereference() calls are simply how an > + * __rcu pointer is read. > + * > + * pci_p2pmem_find_many() and the p2pmem sysfs attributes are the exceptions. > + * The first walks every PCI device, so it can reach a provider whose driver is > + * unbinding: pci_get_device() pins the struct pci_dev, not the driver. The > + * second is reachable from userspace until sysfs_remove_group() runs at the end > + * of the release. pci_has_p2pmem() must dereference the object to determine > + * whether it owns a gen_pool, so even a poolless object must remain alive until Maybe a hyphen with pool-less or maybe better to use plain language: "so even a device without a pool must remain alive..." > + * that RCU reader exits. The sysfs group is created with the pool. > + * > + * The grace period in pci_p2pdma_release() first protects the struct > + * pci_p2pdma itself from being freed while pci_has_p2pmem() is using it. For a > + * pool-backed provider it also fences the gen_pool: gen_pool_alloc_owner() > + * walks pool->chunks under RCU and gen_pool_destroy() frees those chunks > + * without waiting for a grace period of its own, so pci_alloc_p2pmem() and > + * p2pmem_alloc_mmap() hold rcu_read_lock() across the allocation. > + */ > struct pci_p2pdma { > struct gen_pool *pool; > bool p2pmem_published; > @@ -235,9 +268,19 @@ static void pci_p2pdma_release(void *data) > if (!p2pdma) > return; > > - /* Flush and disable pci_alloc_p2p_mem() */ > + /* > + * Stop new RCU readers and wait for readers that observed p2pdma before > + * allowing devres to free it. This is required even without a pool, > + * because pci_has_p2pmem() dereferences every non-NULL p2pdma it finds. > + * For a pool-backed provider this also fences gen_pool_destroy(). > + */ > RCU_INIT_POINTER(pdev->p2pdma, NULL); > synchronize_rcu(); > + > + /* > + * The grace period also ensures no RCU reader can still be accessing > + * map_types here. > + */ > xa_destroy(&p2pdma->map_types); > > if (!p2pdma->pool) > @@ -255,6 +298,9 @@ static void pci_p2pdma_release(void *data) > * for a PCI device. It allocates and sets up the necessary data > * structures to support P2PDMA operations, including mapping type > * tracking. > + * > + * The state is published once per driver bind and torn down by a devres I still find the use of "published" here a bit odd and I'm not sure what "state" it is referring to. > + * action on unbind. Repeated calls for the same device are a no-op. > */ > int pcim_p2pdma_init(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > @@ -786,6 +832,12 @@ calc_map_type_and_dist(struct pci_dev *provider, struct pci_dev *client, > map_type = PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NOT_SUPPORTED; > } > done: > + /* > + * pci_p2pmem_find_many() reaches this with a provider whose driver may > + * be unbinding, so the store runs under RCU: pci_p2pdma_release() > + * clears the pointer and waits for readers before destroying > + * map_types. See "Lifetime and RCU usage" above. > + */ I don't know, but this seems like we're just describing basic RCU usage here. I'm not sure I personally find much value in the comment. > rcu_read_lock(); > p2pdma = rcu_dereference(provider->p2pdma); > if (p2pdma) > Thanks, Logan