Re: [PATCH 09/15] handshake: Add pmksa setter & stealer

James Prestwood <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.iwd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Bryce,

On 11/25/24 11:25 AM, Bryce Johnson wrote:
> Hi James,
> Thanks!  We will running another product through wifi certification in
> the next 3-6 months with a new chipset from TI (cc3301).  I'll check
> with TI to see if there is a pretest so we aren't running into issues
> at the lab.  We got our last product certified reverting back to
> wpa_supplicant just before the wifi alliance pushed out the latest
> changes/requirements.
Great, eager to hear how it goes.
>
> Also annoying the cheaper automatic testing uses wpa_suppliant pretty
> integrated, hopefully wifi alliance will create a way to do that with
> IWD in the same way if enough people are using it.
I'd be interested to see what they are doing with this. If they are 
letting wpa_supplicant act autonomously and triggering things on the AP 
side, or if they are using the CLI to interact with wpa_supplicant 
directly for "force" it to exercise some of the features they're testing.
>
> If anyone got a product through certification I would be interested in
> any experiences with IWD!
>
>
> Bryce
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 8:01 AM James Prestwood <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Denis,
>>
>> On 11/25/24 6:56 AM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> On 11/22/24 9:15 AM, James Prestwood wrote:
>>>> From: Denis Kenzior <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> The majority of this patch was authored by Denis Kenzior, but
>>>> I have appended setting the PMK inside handshake_state_set_pmksa
>>>> as well as checking if the pmkid exists in
>>>> handshake_state_steal_pmkid.
>>>>
>>>> Authored-by: Denis Kenzior <[email protected]>
>>>> Authored-by: James Prestwood <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Makefile.am     |  4 +++
>>>>    src/handshake.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    src/handshake.h | 11 ++++++-
>>>>    3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> @@ -141,7 +142,12 @@ struct handshake_state {
>>>>        bool supplicant_ocvc : 1;
>>>>        bool ext_key_id_capable : 1;
>>>>        bool force_default_ecc_group : 1;
>>>> -    uint8_t ssid[SSID_MAX_SIZE];
>>>> +    bool have_pmksa : 1;
>>>> +    union {
>>>> +        struct pmksa *pmksa;
>>>> +        uint64_t expiration;
>>>> +    };
>>>> +    uint8_t ssid[32];
>>> I changed this back to using SSID_MAX_SIZE instead of the magic number.
>>>
>>>>        size_t ssid_len;
>>>>        char *passphrase;
>>>>        char *password_identifier;
>>> All 15 patches applied, thanks.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Bryce, I know you were interested in this. It would be good to see if
>> this allows IWD to pass certification with the wifi alliance. Let us
>> know if you run into any more problems on that front.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>>
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.