Re: [kbd] Test failures in kbd-2.0.0 on ppc

Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.kbd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
23.09.2013 04:31, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:27:12AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> =========================================
>> 2 of 8 tests failed
>> Please report to [email protected]
>> =========================================
> 
>  The situation is a bit more serious than I thought.  Mac keyboards
> were generally dire and weird, plus I use a KVM switch to share one
> keyboard and monitor between my desktop machines, so I've got a
> regular x86 British keyboard.  This has always worked ok (apart from
> the 101st key being not recognized - that's a kernel problem), and I
> normally use my own keymap [ uk-utf ] to add a lot of things and to
> make the compose settings for accents closer to the Xorg dead keys.
> 
>  With kbd-2.0 (whether compiled with or without the separate lib),
> loadkeys returns a status of 0 but doesn't change the keymap.  Same
> with the shipped uk map.  I've now dropped back to 1.15.5 here and
> my own keymap is working fine.
> 
>  For anyone else who wants to test this, and who has a ppc with a
> regular US keyboard, "loadkeys uk" ought to load the British map
> (double quotes on shifted 2, at-sign on shifted comma, pound
> (sterling) on shifted 3 instead of has-sign.  And if working,
> "loadkeys us" ought to restore it.
> 
>  I repeat that this is with everything else up-to-date, maybe it
> still works with old toolchains, I don't know.
> 

I've another bug report about the regression in the keymap parser:

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36689

-- 
Rgrds, legion
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.