Re: [kbd] [PATCH 5/5] Replace error() by fprintf() and perror()

06.05.2015 22:34, Felix Janda пишет:
> Alexey Gladkov wrote:
>> I prefer to save compatibility with the error() function. It costs
>> nothing, but it does not require to keep in mind the difference
>> between two implementations.
> 
> There is a small cost (which might not be relevant for kbd):
> The compiler does not know that kbd_error() will not return in most
> cases and might emit warnings about possibly uninitialized variables
> because of that.
> 
> Just to mentoin it...

Agree. There is no reason to keep this compatibility right now.

-- 
Rgrds, legion