Re: ansible.cfg pathname setting

On 8/28/25 3:11 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 03:08:48PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On 8/28/25 2:59 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:41:08PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>> Any opinions about this idea? I can build it if folks agree to it.
>>>
>>> I tend to just run my own new make defconfig-foo in each directory for
>>> each workload, so I have opinion on this, but it sounds like perhaps
>>> a kconfig option is desirable, to perhaps opt-in to let it use current
>>> working directory for the file?
>>
>> That's the basic idea. It feels like that would work better "just out
>> of the shrinkwrap".
>>
>>
>>> But if it was not generated then via
>>> make then what would it use? Ie, if you're shaing a built .config to
>>> other directories without making make then it sounds like a requirement
>>> is to also share the generated ansible config?
>>
>> I think that's what I would have to do: include both the .config and
>> an ansible.cfg in the kdevops branch pulled by each test runner.
>>
>> That seems to break the idea that the whole configuration is managed
>> from .config.
> 
> Well, ansible.cfg is generated by stuff you enabled, I think right, so
> one option is that if you *do* opt in for that feature, and you didn't
> want to copy both, it could be smart, and if that feature was enabled
> but ansible.cfg is not found, it could re-generate it.
> 
> Thoughts?

Yes. I'll have a demonstrator patch to post in a few minutes ;-)


-- 
Chuck Lever