Re: [RFC PATCH] Makefile: terraform wasn't building the kdevops_nodes file

On 28/09/2025 21.57, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 9/28/25 12:53 PM, Daniel Gomez wrote:
>> I think both approaches work because nodes do not seem to be requiring hosts.
>> The questions is whether we need both changes? I think we need to ensure 
>> nodes are consistent with inventory changes. And they other way around in 
>> case the user deletes any of the files. So, what do you think about adding
>> this on top of the above?
> 
> I don't understand the Makefile well enough to have an informed opinion!
> But I can try out both alternatives this afternoon.
> 

No worries. I've tried all options myself and the sequence is the only thing
that changes between them. But I think is important to include nodes into
DEFAULT_DEPS after the provision path is triggered.

So, I'd go with my last suggestion which includes all changes.