Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/16] net: introduce QUIC infrastructure and core subcomponents

Xin Long <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.kernel-tls-handshake,dev.linux.lists.quic,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <CADvbK_crxSB+TwDgEtjV6TUEeO9VYtsE6rqy7L_=rzoDrCfORQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 9:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:28:13 -0500 Xin Long wrote:
> > The QUIC protocol, defined in RFC 9000, is a secure, multiplexed transport
> > built on top of UDP. It enables low-latency connection establishment,
> > stream-based communication with flow control, and supports connection
> > migration across network paths, while ensuring confidentiality, integrity,
> > and availability.
>
> Please look thru the Claude review and address the legit complaints:
>
> https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-review.html?id=8ac157b3-6222-4e89-ac52-28e4ca52d6c4
>
> If the tool is confused but not in an dumb way - it may be worth adding
> a relevant comment or info in the commit message. Otherwise a note under
> --- would be appreciated to avoid maintainers having to re-check the
> comments you already considered and disproved.
Thanks for the link.

I just went through the tool’s report. It found one real issue in
quic_packet_backlog_work(), which I’ll fix. The other items aren’t
actual problems, and I’ll add some inline comments or --- notes to
explain them.

>
> Thanks for adding the MAINTAINERS entry, two notes on that:
>  - the entries must be sorted, so you need to move it down under Q
>    instead of putting it next to SCTP
>  - you seem to have copy/pasted the uAPI path for SCTP to the entry
>    instead of QUIC ;)
You're right, thanks!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.