[PATCH PATCH net-next v4 7/8] tls: Restructure tls_sw_read_sock() into submit/deliver phases
Chuck Lever <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:04:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernel-tls-handshake,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> Pipelining multiple AEAD operations requires separating decryption from delivery so that several records can be submitted before any are passed to the read_actor callback. The main loop in tls_sw_read_sock() is split into two explicit phases: a submit phase that decrypts one record onto ctx->rx_list, and a deliver phase that drains rx_list and passes each cleartext skb to the read_actor callback. With a single record per submit phase, behavior is identical to the previous code. A subsequent patch will extend the submit phase to pipeline multiple AEAD operations. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> --- net/tls/tls_sw.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c index 5b154afbd7ac2ddd51b46d8d6bef0a7a41f0a841..5ae7e0c026e4437fe442c3a77b0a6d9623816ce1 100644 --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c @@ -2346,8 +2346,8 @@ int tls_sw_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc, struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk); struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx); struct tls_prot_info *prot = &tls_ctx->prot_info; - struct strp_msg *rxm = NULL; struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; + struct strp_msg *rxm; struct sk_psock *psock; size_t flushed_at = 0; bool released = true; @@ -2372,13 +2372,10 @@ int tls_sw_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc, decrypted = 0; for (;;) { - if (!skb_queue_empty(&ctx->rx_list)) { - skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list); - rxm = strp_msg(skb); - tlm = tls_msg(skb); - } else { - struct tls_decrypt_arg darg; + struct tls_decrypt_arg darg; + /* Phase 1: Submit -- decrypt one record onto rx_list. */ + if (skb_queue_empty(&ctx->rx_list)) { err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, NULL, true, released); if (err <= 0) goto read_sock_end; @@ -2392,38 +2389,43 @@ int tls_sw_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc, released = tls_read_flush_backlog(sk, prot, INT_MAX, 0, decrypted, &flushed_at); - skb = darg.skb; + decrypted += strp_msg(darg.skb)->full_len; + tls_rx_rec_release(ctx); + __skb_queue_tail(&ctx->rx_list, darg.skb); + } + + /* Phase 2: Deliver -- drain rx_list to read_actor */ + while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list)) != NULL) { rxm = strp_msg(skb); tlm = tls_msg(skb); - decrypted += rxm->full_len; - tls_rx_rec_release(ctx); - } - - /* read_sock does not support reading control messages */ - if (tlm->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA) { - err = -EINVAL; - goto read_sock_requeue; - } - - used = read_actor(desc, skb, rxm->offset, rxm->full_len); - if (used <= 0) { - if (!copied) - err = used; - goto read_sock_requeue; - } - copied += used; - if (used < rxm->full_len) { - rxm->offset += used; - rxm->full_len -= used; - if (!desc->count) + /* read_sock does not support reading control messages */ + if (tlm->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA) { + err = -EINVAL; goto read_sock_requeue; - } else { - consume_skb(skb); - skb = NULL; - if (!desc->count) - break; + } + + used = read_actor(desc, skb, rxm->offset, + rxm->full_len); + if (used <= 0) { + if (!copied) + err = used; + goto read_sock_requeue; + } + copied += used; + if (used < rxm->full_len) { + rxm->offset += used; + rxm->full_len -= used; + if (!desc->count) + goto read_sock_requeue; + } else { + consume_skb(skb); + skb = NULL; + } } + /* Drain all of rx_list before honoring !desc->count */ + if (!desc->count) + break; } read_sock_end: -- 2.53.0