Re: [PATCH net 5/7] net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit
Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Tue, 19 May 2026 09:59:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernel-tls-handshake,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/18/26 20:24, Chuck Lever wrote: > From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> > > handshake_req_next() removes the request from the per-net > pending list and drops hn_lock before handshake_nl_accept_doit() > reads req->hr_sk->sk_socket and dereferences sock->file (once in > FD_PREPARE() and again in get_file()). In that window a > consumer running tls_handshake_cancel() followed by sockfd_put() > (svc_sock_free) or __fput_sync() (xs_reset_transport) releases > sock->file. sock_release() then runs sock_orphan(), zeroing > sk_socket, and frees the struct socket. The accept-side code > either reads NULL through sk_socket or chases freed memory. > > The submit-side sock_hold() does not prevent this. sk_refcnt > protects struct sock, but struct socket and sock->file are > independently refcounted via the file descriptor the consumer > owns. Pinning sk leaves sock and sock->file unprotected. > > Retarget the accept-side dereferences at req->hr_file, which was > pinned at submit time, instead of req->hr_sk->sk_socket->file. > Pinning on its own is not sufficient: a consumer that cancels > between handshake_req_next() returning and accept_doit reaching > FD_PREPARE() takes the !remove_pending() branch in > handshake_req_cancel() and drops hr_file before the accept side > takes its own reference. Hand off an additional file reference > inside handshake_req_next(), under hn_lock, so the accept side > operates on a reference that no concurrent handshake_req_cancel() > can revoke. FD_PREPARE() consumes that handed-off reference, > either by transferring it to the new fd in fd_publish() or by > dropping it in the cleanup destructor on error; the explicit > get_file() that previously balanced FD_PREPARE() is therefore > redundant and goes away. > > Update handshake_req_cancel_test2 and _test3 to simulate the > FD_PREPARE() consumption with an fput() so the kunit file-count > assertions stay balanced. > > Reported-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]> > Fixes: 3b3009ea8abb ("net/handshake: Create a NETLINK service for handling handshake requests") > Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> > --- > net/handshake/handshake-test.c | 8 ++++++++ > net/handshake/netlink.c | 7 ++----- > net/handshake/request.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > I _think_ this should fix the issue I had reported about a kernel oops in __sys_recvfrom() in tlshd. Which has all the symptoms described here. So glad that it's been addressed. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich