Re: Please add new Android branches
Todd Kjos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHRSSEzo0cSQCp_zk4h2BP2EGdqVHSbZOLC-3gf7c6+uOK9R4g@mail.gmail.com> |
+Viktor Martensson +Betty Zhou Guillaume, I think that's a great idea. I'll get back to you with the set of configs, arch, compilers we'd like to have coverage for. -Todd On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:46 AM Guillaume Tucker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Todd, > > On 05/09/2023 19:18, Todd Kjos wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 8:56 AM Todd Kjos <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 4:57 AM Guillaume Tucker <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Todd, > >>> > >>> On 11/07/2023 00:41, Todd Kjos wrote: > >>>> Please add the following new Android branches to kernelci testing. > >>>> > >>>> repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common > >>>> branches: > >>>> - android15-6.1 > >>>> - android14-6.1-lts > >>>> - android14-5.15-lts > >>> > >>> I've created this PR accordingly: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull/2002 > >>> > >>> Please note that we're now operating with reduced build coverage > >>> due to some temporary limitations with our Azure subscription. I > >>> know the Android kernel builds should be covered by the GCP > >>> clusters but right now the system is designed to distribute > >>> kernel builds randomly across all clusters so we can't easily tie > >>> Android builds to the Android clusters. Hopefully we'll find a > >>> solution to go back to normal coverage within a week or two. > >> > >> > >> Hi Guillaume, Any ETA for when the full set of builds is restored? We still have greatly reduced build coverage and it's been a month. > > > > Ping. We are getting a lot less value out of kernelci with the greatly > > reduced set of builds for the Android kernels. When will the full > > build coverage be resumed? > > > > If it needs to stay reduced, can we decide precisely which builds are > > done for Android kernels? > > Sorry for the slow reply. > > I think it's fine now to re-enable the Android builds and maybe > we should also take this opportunity to confirm which ones are > the most relevant to you guys. As part of the process of > adjusting the build coverage, I also fixed the GKI builds which I > thought were the main ones. Even if there is enough build > capacity to build "everything", keeping it streamlined to what is > really useful makes the overall system more effective. > > Are there any particular combinations of arch, config, compilers > you care about more than others? > > Thanks, > Guillaume >