Re: Reduced build and test coverage
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 04:44:06PM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > On mar, sep 19 2023 at 15:31:31, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we're doing this -next would be very helpful too. > Does it make sense to bisect -next, though? Considering that it's > constantly rebased, so I don't think it has a coherent and "linear" log > like mainline. That means that bisections aren't guaranteed to work on > it. Is that right? When bisecting -next you should generally bisect it against the mainline it was based on.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmUJyG8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CrhAf9G/EO+iyp4NxWbQQfLACqPGwoOC+ebOBSbfqHzC1toedwQ2D5pMgKhvmj sNPknzD+elnXlOAzBcNPw8+eluMLNTZJCKV4HVAdPaYOq+Rcw/NciJqJgHRzN1Ku XO8EKyriVloP/+6JCGjyW6Jr2R7xayBCK5FRvfsYJ5Qf8OygxHP9Qpa77sosB7Ff O8LC9RSQW5xb1soYqZ4yUGV+giw2Bwdpuoazt6hzo24UQjO4uTMZ5efO4km2jQFn lEWaeqB3yji7SgjcMrMuc1aFbPMPvpXAfvqJ1RX/z0CBbeh4mslVD31XiJCnbtZz DRr+2Yt+DsJuWraYdZNMh66VSxob7A== =pnO9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----