Re: kci command line poll: Click or Typer?

Guillaume Tucker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.kernelci
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Cyril,

On 22/09/2023 09:59, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> I see exactly 0% of the people saying to stay with argparse, but that would be my recommendation.
>> The rationale for this is that argparse is old and unlikely to be changed in an incompatible way in
>> some future version of Python. 
> 
> +1

So that's +1 vote count for argparse I guess?

> We recently started to work on new tooling for running LTP tests written
> in python and after a few up and downs we ended up with using the bare
> minimum of modules we can get away with. Less is clearly more in this
> context.

That's very valuable feedback, thanks.  I would expect a similar
kind of audience running the new kci tool as the LTP ones.

Next step, we can start designing a stable kci syntax this week
with commands and arguments regardless of the implementation
framework.  Then next week we'll recap on this discussion to come
up with a plan that maximises both maintainability and user
adoption in the community.

Thanks,
Guillaume
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.