Re: kci command line poll: Click or Typer?
Guillaume Tucker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Cyril, On 22/09/2023 09:59, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! >> I see exactly 0% of the people saying to stay with argparse, but that would be my recommendation. >> The rationale for this is that argparse is old and unlikely to be changed in an incompatible way in >> some future version of Python. > > +1 So that's +1 vote count for argparse I guess? > We recently started to work on new tooling for running LTP tests written > in python and after a few up and downs we ended up with using the bare > minimum of modules we can get away with. Less is clearly more in this > context. That's very valuable feedback, thanks. I would expect a similar kind of audience running the new kci tool as the LTP ones. Next step, we can start designing a stable kci syntax this week with commands and arguments regardless of the implementation framework. Then next week we'll recap on this discussion to come up with a plan that maximises both maintainability and user adoption in the community. Thanks, Guillaume