Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: field for required tests
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.workflows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 02:14:24PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > Yes, that would be better indeed. However, checkpatch.pl doesn't process > cover letters, and so we would have no automated way to advertise and nudge > people towards testing. Back when I used to run checkpatch it seemed to cope, it obviously wouldn't find much to look at in there but you could feed it an entire series with cover letter and the cover letter wouldn't cause any extra issues. > P.S. Git forges do that for you by nature of actually running the tests > themselves, automatically. *Ducks* The ability of forges to run tests is not hugely relevant to large portions of the kernel, for drivers you're wanting the tests to run on the relevant hardware and even core changes will often need hardware that exercises the relevant features to run. In these areas you're more just looking for someone to say that they've done relevant testing but there's not a substantial difference between say a comment on a pull request or a followup email.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmVWGFoACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AeZAgAg+JmZgZNthFaRqyIyCVAR/ZkQ8y/GPd1t66kltaih2DNQN0LgDimZkbL E1WLk31iwr/3GgYS9cpjmIQfb9ecP/To/qutmOF4BjPbF6xRZWl6JwVWfo87uk4Z yOWVc02g5PcPZfN+DlEbOuWWovro/LKqYk3UK6UmNyINgAE/i6cCx/NjR5D6lXpK 1SKHlrAYxTD79qi9vS3hEODCCactSKu2n9ezinaf/3iZAIwN6qdDra0wgyZ+RCEF rbjXmym2EBvPw8yRQXoDIsYlhQi2okscCQAbZQlqP+pMDn2f1raHPczERFVsD65m y5wUNDGS6XRvOVzSzqbhihz+PID1OA== =ARKg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----