Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: field for required tests
David Gow <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.workflows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABVgOSmw6pn5eRg6Z+4am=OJ9E4RN30Zsfaci6DE+dRKA+-4iw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 14:05, Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:27:33PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > This is the sort of thing that kcidb (which Nikolai works on) is good at > > ingesting, I actually do push all my CI's test results into there > > already: > > > > https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/ > > > > (the dashboard is down currently.) A few other projects including the > > current KernelCI and RedHat's CKI push their data in there too, I'm sure > > Nikolai would be delighted to get more people pushing data in. The goal > > is to merge this with the main KernelCI infrastructure, it's currently > > separate while people figure out the whole big data thing. > > Looking at the kernelci, it appears that it's using a JSON submission > format. Is there conversion scripts that take a KTAP test report, or > a Junit XML test report? The kunit.py script has a very basic KCIDB JSON exporter, via the --json option. This can be used as a generic KTAP -> KCIDB converter with kunit.py parse --json It definitely still needs some work (there are a bunch of bugs, hardcoded fields for things KTAP doesn't expose, some other output may get mixed in, etc), but does exist as a starting point. -- David
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 3.9 KB) - not displayed