Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] kselftest: devices: Add sample board file for google,spherion
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ee913bc5-c752-4da7-a140-7492f429c2cb@notapiano> |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:10:46AM +0000, Bird, Tim wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: NÃcolas F. R. A. Prado <[email protected]> > > Add a sample board file describing the file's format and with the list > > of devices expected to be probed on the google,spherion machine as an > > example. > > > > Signed-off-by: NÃcolas F. R. A. Prado <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > (no changes since v1) > > > > .../testing/selftests/devices/boards/google,spherion | 12 ++++++++++++ > > Overall, while trying to maintain a comprehensive set of board definitions > seems hard, I think having a few as examples is useful. > > I'm not a big fan of naming these with a comma in the name. Is there a reason > you are not using dash or underscore? I'm using the name that we get from the DT compatible, so the right file can be automatically selected by the test. > > Do you anticipate a convention of <producer> <board-or-product-name> tuples for > the filename? I'd just stick to the DT compatible as it's the simplest option and should work just the same, assuming I understood correctly what you mean. Thanks, NÃcolas