Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: entry for tests

On 12/6/23 10:12, David Gow wrote:
> I'm pretty happy with this personally, though I definitely think we
> need the support for tests which aren't just executable scripts (e.g.
> the docs in patch 6).
> 
> The get_maintailer.pl bits, and hence the requirement to not include
> '@', feel a little bit 'off': I'd rather get_maintainer.pl kept emails
> and tests separate by some other means (either having --test _only_
> print tests, not emails at all, or by giving them a prefix like
> 'TEST:' or something). But that is diverging more from the existing
> behaviour of get_maintainer.pl, so I could go either way.
> 
> Otherwise, this looks pretty good. I'll give it a proper test tomorrow
> alongside the other patches.

Thanks for the review, David!

Yeah, I don't like the '@' bit myself, but it seems to be the path of least 
resistance right now (not necessarily the best one, of course).

I'm up for adding an option to get_maintainer.pl that disables email output, 
if people like that, though.

Nick