Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Add test to verify probe of devices from discoverable busses
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-usb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <fb89ae5c-f3ef-49de-b93c-da6c8b92b06c@notapiano> |
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 10:45:59AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Life hack: Don't put RFC in the subject. Especially if it's a v2 or > higher. No one reads RFC patches. Thanks for the tip. I've had a mixed experience with RFC series in the past, though this time around I did get some feedback on the previous versions so I can't complain. And I wasn't expecting swift replies in the middle of the holidays :). In any case, this should be the last RFC version as I feel like the approach has consolidated by now. > > This patchset seems like a low risk patch to apply. That's an interesting take on the usage of RFC I hadn't considered. Thanks, NÃcolas