Re: UM-Linux compilation on Android Common Kernels

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 12:08 AM Guillaume Tucker
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 06/07/2023 19:00, Todd Kjos wrote:
> > Any progress on this? (at least doing the um builds?)
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 3:46 PM Todd Kjos <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 9:23 AM Guillaume Tucker
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     > Hi Todd,
> >     >
> >     > On 14/09/2022 22:36, Todd Kjos via groups.io <http://groups.io> wrote:
> >     > > Is there an ETA for at least doing the builds?
> >     >
> >     > I don't think anyone else is asking for user-mode builds, and
> >     > adding this new architecture with a new sub-architecture
> >     > parameter is not as trivial as adding a few lines of YAML config.
> >     > So unless someone on this list is interested, or someone wants to
> >     > run an internship topic around that, I think you'll have to go
> >     > and find someone to do the work.
> >     >
> >     > KernelCI is starting to run KUnit which does involve UM-Linux
> >     > builds but that's all done "under the hood" by the KUnit
> >     > framework.  Still, I guess it would catch some build errors as a
> >     > side-effect.  So an alternative is to wait for that to be fully
> >     > in production (first half 2023) and we can consider enabling it
> >     > on some Android kernel trees.
> >
> >     Is this in production now?
>
> No, the timeline for making the new API & Pipeline as the new
> production system is basically bumped to 2024.  However, KUnit
> jobs are now being run every day on our staging instance and
> we're planning to have an "early access" stable instance online
> in the next couple of months.  I think we'll get back to you at
> that point.

Any update on the schedule for the new API/Pipeline or the "early access"?

>
> Thank you for your understanding.
>
> Best wishes,
> Guillaume
>
> >     > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 4:59 AM Mark Brown <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >     > >
> >     > >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 08:44:25AM -0700, Todd Kjos wrote:
> >     > >>> Could we start by building but not testing? That at least prevents build
> >     > >>> breakage (which is the case that motivated this).
> >     > >>
> >     > >> Yes, that's definitely an easier first step.
> >     > >>
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >     > > Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> >     > > View/Reply Online (#1593): https://groups.io/g/kernelci/message/1593 <https://groups.io/g/kernelci/message/1593>
> >     > > Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93087607/924702 <https://groups.io/mt/93087607/924702>
> >     > > Group Owner: [email protected] <mailto:kernelci%[email protected]>
> >     > > Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/kernelci/unsub <https://groups.io/g/kernelci/unsub> [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
> >     > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> >
>