Re: New name for new "KernelCI"

On 05/06/2024 12:00, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 5/23/24 6:54 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> As you know, we've been developing the new KernelCI API [1], and the
>> kernelci-pipeline [2] based on it, for quite a while.
>>
>> However, by now it seems that too many things are being called "KernelCI": the
>> project, pieces of the old system, pieces of the new system. We would also
>> like to give the name of KernelCI the project a wider scope than just a
>> particular CI system, and accommodate more packages/projects under its name.
>>
>> So we would like to propose to call the new system "KernelCI <Something>".
>>
>> And this message is about that "<Something>".
> 
> Almost two weeks have passed from my original message, and we have collected a
> number of opinions and potential names. So I went ahead and created a poll to
> help us pick the new name:
> 
> https://forms.gle/GY2uWw3yGLA6u5EbA
> 
> The poll requires authenticating to Google to limit the number of votes, but
> if anyone has a problem with that, just post your response here (pick all the
> options you like), and I'll add it myself. We'll close the poll in a week.
> 
> If you've already responded with your preferences on the maillists, and don't
> want them changed, there's no need to vote again (although you can).
> 
> Our options (assume each is used with "KernelCI" in front):
> 
> Anthill
> Arrow
> Kraken
> Lens
> Lighthouse
> Maestro
> Needle
> Nucleus
> PristineCI
> Pulse
> Sense
> Sensei
> Tamanduá
> Trails
> Warden
> Yuga

Would this encompass KCIDB or would it remain a separate project?

Guillaume