Re: RISC-V
Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.kernelci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Gustavo, Donald, On 01/10/2024 18:36, Donald Zickus wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 12:31 PM Gustavo Padovan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Alexandre, >> >> ---- On Tue, 01 Oct 2024 12:21:49 -0300 Alexandre Ghiti wrote --- >> >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > We (the RISC-V community) are looking for improving our CIs that are >> > currently spread over all the RISC-V companies, mostly private and very >> > incomplete. >> >> That is great to hear! We have other hardware vendors coming to KernelCI with the same wishes of improving CI overall. >> >> > >> > I only found one RISC-V build in kernelci, can I do something to help >> > adding a better RISC-V support? >> >> YES! >> >> First of all, we can enable more kernel trees and kernel configs in the maestro system. >> That would give you wider build coverage. If you have a list of configs we can work on adding these. >> - https://docs.kernelci.org/kernel-community/ >> >> Then, we have to look at running these kernel on actual RISC-V devices. We can get RISC-V devices in KernelCI through a maestro lab, either through some of the existing labs or setting up a dedicated lab. Cc'ing Rafael from RISC-V as we discussed that already. >> - https://docs.kernelci.org/labs/ >> >> Another way, that could be relatively easy if you have a CI setup already, is to get the results of the current CIs in the RISC-V ecosystem into KCIDB (as long as you area running fully Open Source software in those tests). >> - https://docs.kernelci.org/kcidb/ >> >> Let us know how does that sound to you. We would happy to learn more about the ways we can make this work and chat more with you. > In addition to everything Gustavo mentioned above, Red Hat's Fedora > project can be another path as it uses CKI to do some CI testing and > submit results to the same KCIDB mentioned above. I believe Red Hat > already has folks in the RISC-V community working on getting the > hardware enabled on Fedora and possibly RHEL. Just another option. > Either way works or both! > > Cheers, > Don > >> Best, >> >> - Gus >> >> Sorry for the late answer! Bjorn and I have been talking with Rafael and we'll soon come up with a plan to integrate RISC-V in KernelCI, I'll keep you posted :) Thanks again for your quick answers, Alex