Re: fix for kernelci errors?

"Denys Fedoryshchenko" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.kernelci
Message-ID <44-67206080-b-17df13@5111824>
On Tuesday, October 29, 2024 00:23 EET, Todd Kjos <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm looking through the android kernel build failures using the new UI
> (still a little painful since it is missing some features compared to
> the old UI, but getting better). I have questions on 3 of our error
> cases:
> 
> 1. android16-6.12 (gcc tools building *+allmodconfig):
> /bin/sh: 1: gawk: not found
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.vmlinux:47: modules.builtin.ranges] Error 127
> make[2]: *** Deleting file 'modules.builtin.ranges'
> make[1]: *** [/tmp/kci/linux/Makefile:1227: vmlinux] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:242: __sub-make] Error 2
> 
> Is gawk missing on your build machines? How do we fix this?
PR with fix is already in the testing, likely will be merged today and pushed into production
https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull/2723

> 
> 2. android15-6.6 (clang tools building *+allmodconfig):
> drivers/i3c/master/svc-i3c-master.c:1100:29: error: variable 'reg' is
> uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> 
> It looks like the stable kernels only have 1 clang build configured
> (x86_64_defconfig). Would it be possible to add an allmodconfig build
> using clang so we can compare our allmodconfig failures with the
> stable kernel?
Do you mean stable-rc kernels?

> 
> 3. android-mainline
> 
> Is there a reason that there are no allmodconfig builds of
> mainline.master? It would help us to know if we introduced an issue if
> we could see the equivalent upstream build. It seems like it would
> also benefit upstream to see those issues early.
> 
allmodconfig is quite heavy build, and as legacy is still running, we are unable to use build capacity allocated for it, and Maestro-own build capacity is limited. If it is just mainline master - we can try to run it.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.