Re: [git pull] d_revalidate pile

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jan 2025 20:38:50 +0000
Newsgroups	dev.linux.lists.kernelci,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:12:11AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 09:19, Sasha Levin <[email protected]> wrote:

> > With this pulled on top of Linus's tree, LKFT is managing to trigger
> > kfence warnings:

> > <3>[   62.180289] BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds read in d_same_name+0x4c/0xd0
> > <3>[   62.180289]
> > <3>[   62.182647] Out-of-bounds read at 0x00000000eedd4b55 (64B right of kfence-#174):
> > <4>[   62.184178]  d_same_name+0x4c/0xd0

> Bah. I've said this before, but I really wish LKFT would use debug
> builds and run the warnings through scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh.

> Getting filenames and line numbers (and inlining information!) for
> stack traces can be really really useful.

> I think you are using KernelCI builds (at least that was the case last
> time), and apparently they are non-debug builds. And that's possibly
> due to just resource issues (the debug info does take a lot more disk
> space and makes link times much longer too). So it might not be easily
> fixable.

They're not, they're using their own builds done with their tuxsuite
service which is a cloud front end for their tuxmake tool, that does
have the ability to save the vmlinux.  Poking around the LKFT output it
does look like they're doing that for the LKFT builds:

   https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/sashal-linus-next/build/v6.13-rc7-8584-gd4639f3659ae/testrun/27027254/suite/build/test/gcc-13-tinyconfig/details/
   https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2sDW1jDhjHPNl1XNezFhsjSlvpI/

so hopefully the information is all there and it's just a question of
people doing the decode when reporting issues from LKFT.

> But let's see if it might be an option to get this capability. So I'm
> adding the kernelci list to see if somebody goes "Oh, that was just an
> oversight" and might easily be made to happen. Fingers crossed.

The issue with KernelCI has been that it's not storing the vmlinux, this
was indeed done due to space issues like you suggest.  With the new
infrastructure that's been rolled out as part of the KernelCI 2.0 revamp
the storage should be a lot more scaleable and so this should hopefully
be a cost issue rather than actual space limits like it used to be so
more tractable.  AFAICT we haven't actually revisited making the
required changes to include the vmlinux in the stored output though, I
filed a ticket:

   https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-project/issues/509

The builds themselves are generally using standard defconfigs and
derivatives of that so will normally have enough debug info for
decode_stacktrace.sh.  Where they don't we should probably just change
that upstream.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)