Re: FW: Questions about kernelCI tools

Hello,

On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 00:41 +0000, 林 拓真 wrote:
> To: KernelCI community   
> Cc: Denys Fedoryshchenko
> 
> Does anyone here answer the additional question ?
> 
> > > How should we avoid using KCIDB ? (but we still want self-hosted
> > > dashboard) We have seen a legacy version of the ?>> dashboard for
> > > KernelCI, but I could not find setup guide like "get-started".
Unfortunately KCIDB is essential part of dashboard.

KCIDB deployment guide is available at
https://github.com/kernelci/kcidb/blob/main/doc/administrator_guide.md

Legacy dashboard is not supported anymore and not compatible with
recent system.

> 
> Thank you.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 林 拓真 
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 4:49 PM
> To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Questions about kernelCI tools
> 
> To Denys Fedoryshchenko.
> 
> Thank you for your quick reply.
> 
> > > You can follow issue to see when it is fixed.
> 
> I checked and applied the patch of
> https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-api/pull/591 to my local.
> Then I have seen it's working fine. Thank you!　(But the issue is not
> closed yet...)
> 
> > > That said, we’d love to hear more about what’s most important to
> > > you—whether it’s prioritizing the self-hosted aspect or any other
> > > features.
> 
> One of the most important things is that we don’t want to expose any
> information about the board we have under development state.
> In that state, we still want self-hosted KernelCI to manage our test
> results and publish it for the limited number of stakeholders.
> Finally, also we think we can send the LTP result to the
> KCIDB/dashboard that is maintained by Linux foundation.
> 
> Sorry if this is a repetitive question.
> How should we avoid using KCIDB ? (but we still want self-hosted
> dashboard) We have seen a legacy version of the dashboard for
> KernelCI, but I could not find setup guide like "get-started".
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 5:08 PM
> To: 林 拓真 <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Questions about kernelCI tools
> 
> Hello 林 拓真,
> 
> 1. I guess it is about KCIDB, we have it planned. We totally get why
> having a fully self-hosted KernelCI setup would be useful, especially
> for teams looking to avoid external dependencies like Google Cloud.
> 
> Making KernelCI self-hosted is definitely on our roadmap. The good
> news is that we’ve already started thinking about it, but with the
> number of features we’re juggling and the small team we have, it’s
> taking us some time to get there. For example one of features we are
> working on, is making storage backend more "cloud-independent-
> friendly".
> 
> That said, we’d love to hear more about what’s most important to
> you—whether it’s prioritizing the self-hosted aspect or any other
> features. If there’s interest in collaborating or sponsoring certain
> areas, it could really help speed things up.
> 
> 2.Thank you for report, yes it is a bug, likely appeared during our
> latest pydantic upgrade.
> I opened issue and will try to fix it this or max next week, as it is
> critical for user management bug.
> https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-api/issues/589
> You can follow issue to see when it is fixed.
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2024-12-12 at 04:29 +0000, 林 拓真 wrote:
> > Hello community.
> > 
> > I am currently trying to run LTP test on LavaLab with Maestro and 
> > KCIDB.
> > Also have currently considered building all modules of KernelCI
> > "on- 
> > premise".
> > then I have two questions about the way I am trying.
> > 
> > Question 1：
> > Is it possible to get rid of the dependency on GoogleCloud?
> > (So I am looking for the right way to build KernelCI on-premise
> > more 
> > quick and easier…)
> > 
> > Question 2：
> > I encountered the error below while trying to build Maestro and, 
> > trying to get the API access token for connecting to the kernelci-
> > api 
> > container from the pipeline.
> > Following steps here I have tried: (Referred to
> > https://docs.kernelci.org/admin/api/)
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Step 1. Run bash in the kernelci-api container. $ docker exec ?it 
> > kernelci-api /bin/bash
> > 
> > Step 2. Create an administrator within the api app.
> > $ python3 ?m api.admin ?email “<administrator-mail-address>”
> >    (trapped) error reading bcrypt version
> >    Traceback (most recent call last):
> >    File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site- 
> > packages/passlib/handlers/bcrypt.py", line 620, in
> > _load_backend_mixin
> >    version = _bcrypt.__about__.__version__
> >                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >    AttributeError: module 'bcrypt' has no attribute '__about__’
> >    Creating admin user...
> > 
> > This above error I encountered does not seem to be fatal as far as
> > I 
> > read the KernelCI implementation.
> > then I went to the next step.
> > 
> > 3. Obtain the token of the administrator in the api app.
> > $ kci user token admin
> > Error: KerError: Value not found for None
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Is there any missing steps I should do before?
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > Hayashi
> > 
>