Re: Enabling additional KUnit tests in KernelCI?

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 08:21:26PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 11:55:46PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> 
> > I would like the KUnit tests in lib/crypto/tests/ and lib/crc/tests/ to
> > run in KernelCI and have any failures reported to
> > [email protected].  Preferably on all platforms, not just
> > UML, since UML doesn't cover all the code.  Is there a way to do this?
> > What is the status of KUnit in KernelCI?  I'm having a hard time finding
> > information about this, and looking at the latest mainline test results
> > (https://dashboard.kernelci.org/tree/mainline/master/4ae12d8bd9a830799db335ee661d6cbc6597f838?p=t)
> > there seem to be no KUnit tests running at all.
> 
> We should be running KUnit tests:
> 
>   https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-pipeline/blob/a3b622cfee641e26bed1906b29ed7065bee45921/config/jobs.yaml#L2153
> 
>   https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-pipeline/blob/a3b622cfee641e26bed1906b29ed7065bee45921/config/scheduler.yaml#L1750

Which ones?  Does anything need to be done to add new tests to the list?

Note that even if "all" tests are being run (via
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y), that includes only the tests whose
dependencies are met.  There can be additional kconfig dependencies.

> though like you say something seems to be going AWOL with at least the
> reporting, I can't see any results either.  The job that's configured
> there is to run on x86_64 rather than UML so is probably what you're
> looking for in terms of the tests?

The kernel has optimized crypto and/or CRC code for the following
architectures: arm, arm64, mips, powerpc, riscv, s390, sparc, x86.  In
many cases there's also a finer division based on CPU features.

So I'm looking for testing on as many platforms as possible.  But some
x86_64 platform is a good start, certainly better than nothing.

- Eric