RE: [PATCH] [v2] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated content
"Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ksummit,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.workflows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SJ1PR11MB6083291B22FFEC4F38999D31FCCEA@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> |
> I think we should treat any AI generated patches similarly: people > should mention the tool it was done with, and the script (ok, the > "scripts" are called "prompts", because AI is so "special") used. AI is also special in that it is effectively non-deterministic. You probably won't get the same output from the same prompt. Maybe still helpful to include the prompt, but it has less utility that a sed or coccinelle script. -Tony