Re: [PATCH] [v3] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated content

On 11/15/25 15:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> As Dave responded to Luis, although that is a good idea, it's out of
>>> scope for this document (for now).
>> I should have said it's out of scope for this patch, not document. The
>> point is that what tag to use for this is a separate discussion.
> Which should be held in the context of this patch to make it complete.

In a perfect world, I totally agree.

But the tag is something we can't really take back. It's like an ABI in
that there needs to be some kind of contract between producers and
consumers, and it's harmful if the contract needs to be revised.

Given how messy the process of formalizing a tag is, I'd really hate
to tie the two things (a policy document and a tag) together
unnecessarily.