Re: Support needed to continue Smatch work
Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:38:09 +0300
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ksummit,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I need to post an update on the current situation with Smatch. First of all, I want to start by thanking Brad Spengler from grsecurity who reached out to me on this, offered some funding, and has been trying to push the Smatch work forward. It really means a lot to me. Unfortunately, we haven't been able to raise enough support to continue my Smatch work. I have still been filtering zero day bot warnings and I am a bit worried that people have the impression that I'm reviewing static checker warnings when I am not. The situation isn't great. The zero day bot can't do cross function analsysis and it only looks at checks with a low false positive rate. We're missing out on a bunch of bugs. I'm going to add some of the those missed warnings to this thread so people have a better picture of what we're missing. There are some buffer overflows in there. A bunch of off by one bugs. A missing error code in fork(). And random other minor things as well. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ I am still trying to figure out a way to restart Smatch checking. The funding model would be that several companies would support this project by paying a proportion of my salary. Part of that goes to reporting bugs like the ones above and part of that goes to developing Smatch and writing new checks. Please, contact Bill Fletcher <[email protected]> if you would like to support this work. regards, dan carpenter