Re: DRM/panel: Bringing Linux DRM Display Panel support in the modern age
Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Jun 2026 14:52:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ksummit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260604-grinning-determined-falcon-0e8b01@houat> |
Hi, On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 09:41:18AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Since the introduction of the first Samsung DSI panel, the Linux DRM panel > API has been a crucial piece of software for enabling displays across > diverse architectures, but it has not evolved alongside modern graphics stacks. > Currently, the API lacks atomic DRM API support and the ability to adapt > power setups during mode changes. > Furthermore, it fails to support advanced Display Driver IC (DDIC) features > that modern hardware heavily relies on, including: > - Standby and advanced power states > - Advanced color management > - Dynamic rate switching > - Command mode self-refresh > > This lack of evolution has led to severe fragmentation between > upstream and vendor downstream trees for advanced devices support, > creating a heavy maintenance burden and making native hardware support > incredibly difficult. > > The goal would be to outline these architectural limitations and > trigger a discussion on how to collaboratively modernize the panel > API. By standardizing advanced DDIC capabilities and fully embracing > the atomic DRM API, we hope to establish a unified path forward for > the entire Linux community. I acknowledge it might sound a bit like "let's burn the whole thing to the ground", but what you just described sounds an awful lot like what the bridge API already does. Let's acknowledge that drm_bridge isn't just about bridge anymore, make panels bridges, and we're done. The main problem with panels imo is how obscure they are, and are pretty much fire-and-forget for panel vendors, so they have no incentive to spend time upstreaming. It really feels like a similar position compared to what HID was, and I wonder if doing a dumb bridge driver for panels with ebpf support so we can put all the panel quirks in userspace like HID-BPF would be the way forward. Maxime
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 273 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iJUEABMJAB0WIQTkHFbLp4ejekA/qfgnX84Zoj2+dgUCaiF1GwAKCRAnX84Zoj2+ doHDAYCBrqL1buzgpRurHrXaL+cL4+HJpKsrwXtj7pMKZDN7mPnwvqRT46OpoGZs VAU0rVcBf2E56OIzP5+kRl6+YsiAWI0cPo+if10j3AqdfDOwJrllfksj6waujVtc ze7YMspSDA== =3Jk9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----