Re: [TECH TOPIC] Implementing malloc
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:21:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ksummit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdUBHvY30ZuV=mpnkQ0Fip4vk0iqb252H9YNiOJ=AtPpyg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Dan, On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 20:52, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 06:11:21PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > I agree that many memory allocations benefit from providing more semantic > > information to both the compiler and the runtime, as you suggest. > > What I don't think we benefit from is "And you have to pass this magic > > GFP_KERNEL argument too. Unless it's GFP_ATOMIC or something". > > You know that most people are using kzmalloc_obj() these days and so > they don't pass GFP_KERNEL... You know that most people are using the devm_*() allocators these days and so they do pass GFP_KERNEL? ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds