Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] The place of AI code review in the Linux Kernel process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:26:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ksummit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:21:03 +0000 Roman Gushchin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Many engineers have asked for some sort of interactive mode where they > >> can ask additional questions or follow up on the initial feedback from > >> Sashiko. I plan to add this to the local review mode, but for the > >> central public instance, it is problematic from both security and token > >> cost perspectives. > > > > Could there some way to download the entire context from all the passes > > to a local environment and have a local llm chew on it to answer > > questions? > > Yeah, it's an option I though about. Like a download button which just > dumps all relevant context as an .md file, for example. The better would be to produce, instead, a trained dataset - or - even better - a patch-review kernel-trained model with a couple of different sizes (and kv compression), in GGUF format, allowing people to use it directly, e.g. something that could work like this: ollama run hf.co/sashiko/sashiko-<some_model>:8b ollama run hf.co/sashiko/sashiko-<some_model>:36b-a4b Thanks, Mauro