Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] The place of AI code review in the Linux Kernel process

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:33:40 +0100
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.ksummit
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--UF0bDZ5JprLErxBE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 01:08:42PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:

> I agree with Guenter approach here and in a matter of fact, I had just used
> a few minutes ago. I had to review a series where I noticed Sashiko had a
> couple of true finds. So, I just asked the developer to look to that report
> and fix that before I waste my time with reviews that the tool could already
> spot.

> But I was already aware-of and okay-with this entire code design idea and
> approach and this review would be more about the correctness.

Yes, I think that's a very different submitter experience to something
where there's no human intervention at all and much more reasonable.

--UF0bDZ5JprLErxBE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmpiUHMACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9BGPwf7Bh1esE3RdotSkWF3hvOVn5T2wy0OZCR0aGMEZ8ALageGC6rMMxsNAf+e
G5mkz0W1GfXcP7cSua8BKJix85igBWWrubQOwnDG6KWxZfkhDJ/j4xY20XNlySfS
WdHg69lDivbaGj3jT8yELzQaqlg2B3qfueol0Q6+kPL0o+ND1S17L13uyfKtG8qv
O3wbe/FXCRZcrBwOU0UFswgntcSB/DIuN5tCundF7EQOLhxVf4xIwYex+QO/vkgS
ODXEqaJrqMD6D60Ke/S+zrk/kLphi8BEkKN3B/vUj3xBWyFgB7GzwpZcXOR7CG4I
y0BG9eC+wK7OWDwUQJfB0+cLty75MQ==
=IL7R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UF0bDZ5JprLErxBE--