Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Coping with the new-developer flood
Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ksummit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260806-industrious-whippet-of-jest-a91eaa@meerkat> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 05:57:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > At a minimum, one could imagine a bot that notices a patch posted by > > > somebody who has not been seen before and responds with a "Welcome! > > > Here's how we do things here" email. I can probably do this, since I run a bunch of bots on list messages already and this seems like a service that would benefit all subsystems. > > I wonder if we could make the bot more sophisticated than just sending > > a welcome message. If the patch is white-space damaged, or doesn't > > apply against upstream (or if there are indications that it was > > applied against an LTS branch without an explicit LTS tag or something > > indicating that it is a backport), one could imagine having the bot > > sending a newer contributor a more specific set of constructive > > criticisms. Preferably, this would be purely deterministic, such as: - carries "base-commit" - has a signed-off-by - actually applies - isn't against a known LTS branch Failing all these on top of being an unknown/new developer could trigger a quick "here's what you did wrong, oh and welcome btw." -K